Thomasnet
Speya vs Thomasnet
Thomasnet is a product sourcing and supplier discovery platform for North American industry. Xometry announced the acquisition of Thomasnet’s parent company, Thomas Publishing Company, in a filing dated 8 December 2021. Speya is an independent supplier intelligence platform: a team describes a sourcing need in plain language, AI agents discover and vet suppliers worldwide, and the shortlist arrives with sources beside every name. Here is how the two differ, with the sources we used.
By the Speya team
·
Updated
Side by side
How Speya compares, in our assessment.
Capability
Speya
Thomasnet
Supplier discovery
Describe it in plain language
Keyword and category directory search
Vetting
Every supplier AI-vetted
Supplier-claimed profiles
Coverage
Millions of suppliers, global
North American suppliers
Speed to shortlist
Minutes
Depends on buyer research time
Autonomy
Runs the whole case with Speya Auto
Buyer runs the search
Built for
Enterprise procurement
North American industrial buying
Background
The platform, in brief.
Thomasnet is a product sourcing and supplier discovery platform for North American industry. Its About page describes it as “North America’s number one industrial sourcing platform” and says it carries in-depth profiles of “more than 500,000 North American suppliers” across “over 80,000 industrial categories”.
Buyers search, compare and contact suppliers on the platform. Thomasnet’s help centre describes its Smart Search as “a proprietary search engine built for precision”, with filters for category, company type, certifications, location and ownership diversity.
Xometry announced the acquisition of Thomasnet’s parent, Thomas Publishing Company, in a Form 8-K filed on 8 December 2021, which said the transaction was “expected to close on or about December 10, 2021”. Xometry’s Form 10-K for 2021 reported Thomas as a wholly owned subsidiary.
Suppliers can also pay for position. Thomasnet’s supplier programs page states that “Sponsored Listings move your business to the priority positions, ahead of organic listings on the search result pages”, and its help centre describes Performance-Based Listings as business profiles that use “a pay-per-click framed model”.
The gap
Where it stops, in Speya’s assessment.
What follows is Speya’s assessment against the six criteria in the table above, not a measurement, and not a statement by Thomasnet.
Thomasnet is built around a searchable directory. The buyer frames the query, reads the profiles and decides who to approach, and the profiles themselves are claimed and maintained by the suppliers listed in them.
As of 3 September 2026 we found no Thomasnet feature that takes a sourcing brief in plain language, screens candidates against certifications, financial health, ESG and sanctions evidence, and returns a tiered shortlist with the sources beside every name.
Coverage on Thomasnet’s own About page is described as North American, so sourcing outside the United States and Canada sits outside its stated scope. Placement is partly paid: the sponsored listing wording above is Thomasnet’s own.
Speya works the other way round. You describe the need in plain language, AI agents search millions of supplier profiles from 250+ data sources, vet each candidate and return a tiered shortlist in minutes with evidence beside every name. Speya does not sell listings or rankings to suppliers, and it is not owned by or bundled into any procurement suite or ERP vendor.
Sources
Disclosure
Speya publishes this comparison and is one of the two products compared. Speya is not affiliated with, endorsed by or in partnership with the company compared on this page or any other vendor named here. Product names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used only to identify the products discussed. Statements about third-party products reflect the public sources listed above as of the date shown. Speya does not guarantee they are complete or current and corrects reported errors through the contact page. The comparison table and the assessment above are Speya’s editorial view against the criteria shown, not measurements and not statements by the vendor. Speya connects to third-party systems through its open API: enterprise teams can build a custom integration, or ask Speya to scope one, on request and where it makes technical and commercial sense. Speya does not offer a certified or vendor-listed connector and does not warrant compatibility with, or the availability of, any third-party product.
Authority
Why you can trust this comparison.
This comparison comes from the team that builds Speya, used for supplier discovery by IKEA, Roche, Clas Ohlson, Rusta, Ahlsell and STARK Group, plus PwC and Deloitte. We state where we fit and where we do not.
Enterprise procurement
IKEA, Roche, Clas Ohlson, Rusta, Ahlsell and STARK Group source with Speya.
Global consultancies
PwC and Deloitte run client sourcing on the platform.
Independently audited
ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, third-party audited.
EU by default
Hosted in the EU. Supplier data never leaves EU borders.
S
Speya
The Speya team, building AI supplier discovery for enterprise procurement. We cover sourcing, supplier data, risk and compliance.
Last updated
The difference
Why teams choose Speya.
Speya is built for how procurement works now. You describe the need, Speya discovers and AI-vets suppliers across millions worldwide, ranks them into tiers, and can run the whole case on its own. You get a defensible shortlist in minutes, with the evidence beside every name.
Book a demo